000 01471nab a2200265 c 4500
999 _c146892
_d146892
003 ES-MaIEF
005 20221216120757.0
007 ta
008 221216t2022 gw ||||| |||| 00| 0|eng d
040 _aES-MaIEF
_bspa
_cES-MaIEF
100 1 _970284
_aHiraga, Kazuki
245 0 _aWhy is the shape of the Laffer Curve for consumption tax different from that for labor income tax?
_c Kazuki Hiraga, Kengo Nutahara
500 _aResumen.
504 _aBibliografía.
520 _aRecent studies find that the Laffer curve for consumption tax is not hump-shaped, whereas the Laffer curve for labor income tax is hump-shaped. This study investigates the cause of the difference in the shapes of two Laffer curves. It is shown that the effect on the relative price of leisure (RPL) with respect to the consumption tax rate is completely different from that with respect to the labor income tax rate. The elasticity of the RPL from an increasing consumption tax rate is at most 1, whereas it can be infinity in the case of labor income tax.
650 4 _aCONSUMO
_940658
650 4 _aIMPUESTOS
_947460
650 4 _aIMPUESTO SOBRE LOS RENDIMIENTOS DEL TRABAJO
_946442
650 4 _aRENDIMIENTOS DE TRABAJO
_948256
650 4 _aCURVA DE LAFFER
_941715
650 4 _aMODELOS ECONOMETRICOS
_947776
700 1 _970285
_aNutahara, Kengo
773 0 _9168580
_oOP 207/2022/3
_tFinanzArchiv
_w(IEF)21244
_x 0015-2218
_g v. 78, n. 3, September 2022, p. 342-361
942 _cART