000 02201nab a2200277 c 4500
999 _c146004
_d146004
003 ES-MaIEF
005 20220616113557.0
007 ta
008 220615t2022 ne ||||| |||| 00| 0|eng d
040 _aES-MaIEF
_bspa
_cES-MaIEF
100 _949021
_aWeber, Dennis
245 4 _aThe potential relevance of the CJEU case law on group taxation under the EU / UK Trade and Cooperation Agreement
_c Dennis Weber & Jorn Steenbergen
500 _aResumen.
520 _aThe Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) ruled that the national treatment provision in Article 49 Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union precludes Member States from disallowing consolidation between entities resident in the same Member State, where the top holding or intermediate holding company is resident in another Member State. After the United Kingdom left the EU from 1 January 2021, this case law no longer directly applies to situations with a top holding or intermediate holding company resident in the United Kingdom. However, the Trade and Cooperation Agreement concluded and in force between the EU and the United Kingdom (TCA) contains in Article 129 a provision on national treatment. The authors argue that the TCA could be interpreted in line with the national treatment provision in Article 49 TFEU and the case law of the CJEU on this. Notwithstanding the absence of any direct effect to the provision of the TCA, Member States should interpret their bilateral tax treaties in line with the TCA. The consequence is that the non-discrimination provisions in existing bilateral tax treaties between Member States and the United Kingdom should be interpreted in line with the TCA.
650 4 _aGRUPOS DE EMPRESAS
_932211
650 4 _aIMPUESTOS
_947460
650 4 _aCONVENIOS
_941141
650 4 _aTRATADOS INTERNACIONALES
_948608
650 4 _aUNION EUROPEA
_948644
650 4 _aREINO UNIDO
_948241
650 4 _aTRIBUNAL DE JUSTICIA DE LAS COMUNIDADES EUROPEAS
_948611
650 4 _aJURISPRUDENCIA
_947570
700 1 _969547
_aSteenbergen, Jorn
773 0 _9167340
_oOP 2141-B/2022/2
_tEC Tax Review
_w(IEF)124968
_x 0928-2750 [print]
_g v. 31, n. 2, April 2022, p. 97-106
942 _cART