000			01598nab a2200265 c 4500
999			_c145532 _d145532
003			ES-MaIEF
005			20220315133522.0
007			ta
008			220315t2021 us ||||| |||| 00| 0|eng d
040			_aES-MaIEF _bspa _cES-MaIEF
100			_93889 _aBrunner, Eric J.
245		0	_aExperimental evidence about property tax word aversion _c Eric J. Brunner, Mark D. Robbins, Bill Simonsen
260			_c2021
500			_aResumen.
504			_aBibliografía.
520			_aA small but growing literature suggests that simply using the word “tax” can create a visceral negative reaction among citizens. We tested tax word aversion using a representative sample of US residents who are randomly placed into experimental conditions and asked parallel questions about their support for services (approval of a tax increase or a revenue increase). The only difference between the two questions is the word “tax.” We find that the use of the word “tax” lowers support by about six and eight percentage points for fire and school services, respectively. This direct test of tax word aversion is based on a strong experimental design and a sufficient number of observations (over 4000) that allow for precise impact estimates.
650			_aIMPUESTOS _947460
650			_aPROPIEDAD _948168
650		4	_aOPINION PUBLICA _947876
650		4	_aESTADOS UNIDOS _942888
700			_948739 _aRobbins, Mark D.
700			_914174 _aSimonsen, Bill
773	0		_9166806 _oOP 1716/2021/4 _tPublic Budgeting and Finance _w(IEF)90019 _x0275-1100 _gv. 41, n. 4, Winter 2021, p. 50-70
942			_cART