000 01755nab a2200265 c 4500
999 _c145361
_d145361
003 ES-MaIEF
005 20220209165936.0
007 ta
008 220209t2021 ne ||||| |||| 00| 0|eng d
040 _aES-MaIEF
_bspa
_cES-MaIEF
100 _955819
_aPeeters, Bruno
245 _aThe design of Covid-19 recovery contributions
_btaxes or Social Security contributions?
_c Bruno Peeters
260 _c2021
500 _aResumen.
520 _aTo cover the large financial spending caused by the Covid-19 pandemic, countries worldwide are forced to take substantial fiscal actions. This contribution takes a closer look at the extent to which EU law has an influence (restrictive or otherwise) on the freedom of Member States to opt for (additional) taxes and/or social contributions as a means to finance the (additional) deficits in their social security system. First, a brief numerical overview will be given of the various sources of financing and expenditures of social security in the European Union (II). Subsequently, the question will be addressed to which extent the concept of social security contributions under European Union law interferes with the national definition of taxes (III). The most relevant rulings of the European Court of Justice (CJEU) in this respect will be discussed (IV) followed by a number of final considerations (V).
650 _aPANDEMIAS
_967998
650 _aCORONAVIRUS
_967999
650 _aIMPUESTOS
_947460
650 4 _aINGRESOS FISCALES
_947378
650 4 _aSEGURIDAD SOCIAL
_948362
650 4 _aFINANCIACION
_944260
650 4 _aUNION EUROPEA
_948644
773 0 _9166490
_oOP 2141-B/2021/5/6
_tEC Tax Review
_w(IEF)124968
_x 0928-2750 [print]
_gv. 30, n. 5-6, December 2021, p. 236-241
942 _cART