000 | 01335nab a2200253 c 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
999 |
_c144819 _d144819 |
||
003 | ES-MaIEF | ||
005 | 20211013115843.0 | ||
007 | ta | ||
008 | 211011t2021 ne ||||oo|||| 00| 0|eng d | ||
040 |
_aES-MaIEF _bspa _cES-MaIEF |
||
100 |
_959907 _aJhabakh, P. Raj Kumar |
||
245 | 0 |
_aForeign enterprises _helectrónico _beligible as a tested party? _c P. Raj Kumar Jhabakh and Varsha Balasubramanian |
|
260 | _c2021 | ||
500 | _aDisponible únicamente en formato electrónico. | ||
500 | _aResumen. | ||
520 | _aThis article provides an analysis of the recent ruling of the Madras High Court in the case of Virtusa Consulting Services Private Limited v. DCIT, Chennai. The Madras High Court has through this order expanded the scope of who is a "tested party" for the determination of arm's length prices in controlled transactions. The High Court held that a foreign associated enterprise can be a tested party for the purpose of determining the arm's length price. | ||
650 | 4 |
_948095 _aPRECIOS DE TRANSFERENCIA |
|
650 | 4 |
_932211 _aGRUPOS DE EMPRESAS |
|
650 | 4 |
_948469 _aSOCIEDADES EXTRANJERAS |
|
650 | 4 |
_aINDIA _945694 |
|
700 | 1 |
_969324 _aBalasubramanian, Varsha |
|
773 | 0 |
_9165891 _oITPJ/2021/4 _tInternational Transfer Pricing Journal _w(IEF)65014 _x 1385-3074 _gv. 28, n. 4, 2021, p. 288-290 |
|
942 | _cRE |