000 01293nab a2200265 c 4500
999 _c144733
_d144733
003 ES-MaIEF
005 20210929184141.0
007 ta
008 210929t2021 ne ||||| |||| 00| 0|eng d
040 _aES-MaIEF
_bspa
_cES-MaIEF
100 _949618
_aEnglisch, Joachim
245 0 _aState aid prohibition
_bthe new GAAR in town
_c Joachim Englisch
260 _c2021
500 _aDisponible también en formato electrónico.
520 _aIn this editorial the author explores the key findings of the European Commission's decision concerning rulings on two parallel arrangements each involving various Luxembourg-based companies of the Engie Group. The article analyses how European Court of Justice case law has paved the way for a 'State aid GAAR', where the Court could or should have decided differently, and the overall implications of the Engie judgment.
650 4 _948454
_aSOCIEDADES
650 _aIMPUESTOS
_947460
650 _aAYUDA ESTATAL
_932236
650 4 _947658
_aLUXEMBURGO
650 4 _948611
_aTRIBUNAL DE JUSTICIA DE LAS COMUNIDADES EUROPEAS
650 4 _aUNION EUROPEA
_948644
650 4 _aJURISPRUDENCIA
_947570
773 0 _9165665
_oOP 2141-B/2021/4
_tEC Tax Review
_w(IEF)124968
_x 0928-2750 [print]
_gv. 30, Issue 4, August 2021, p. 144-149
942 _cART