000 02215nab a2200277 c 4500
999 _c144496
_d144496
003 ES-MaIEF
005 20210824122136.0
007 ta
008 210805t2021 ne ||||| |||| 00| 0|eng d
040 _aES-MaIEF
_bspa
_cES-MaIEF
100 1 _93984
_aDe Broe, Luc
245 0 _aAre the OECD/G20 pillar two GloBE-rules compliant with the fundamental freedoms?
_c Luc De Broe & Mélanie Massant
260 _c2021
500 _aDisponible también en formato electrónico.
500 _aResumen.
520 _aIn this article, the authors focus on whether the Global Anti-Base Erosion (GloBE) rules, as set out in a Blueprint of October 2020, comply with the EU fundamental freedoms. This compatibility is tested in two distinct scenarios. In the first scenario, the assumption is taken that the GloBE-rules will be implemented directly by the Members States and in the second scenario, the assumption is taken that the GloBE-rules will be implemented indirectly through an EU Directive. The analysis of the first scenario shows that the GloBE-rules collide with the freedom of establishment. For the GloBE-rules to be fully in line with this freedom, it is recommended that they include a substance-based carve-out such as the one foreseen in Article 7(2) of the Anti-Tax Avoidance Directive (ATAD). The analysis of the second scenario, which focuses on the EU principles of subsidiarity and proportionality, shows that, even though the GloBE-rules might collide with the freedom of establishment, they could still be successfully implemented given the broad discretion that the Court of Justice of the European Union leaves to the Union legislature. Nonetheless, also here recommendations are made to reduce disproportionate frictions.
650 4 _aTIPO MÍNIMO GLOBAL
_967681
650 4 _967772
_aSEGUNDO PILAR (OCDE)
650 4 _951249
_aLIBERTAD DE ESTABLECIMIENTO Y SERVICIOS
650 4 _948124
_aPRINCIPIO DE SUBSIDIARIEDAD
650 4 _954031
_aPRINCIPIO DE PROPORCIONALIDAD
650 4 _948644
_aUNION EUROPEA
700 1 _969159
_aMassant, Mélanie
773 0 _9165343
_oOP 2141-B/2021/3
_tEC Tax Review
_w(IEF)124968
_x 0928-2750 [print]
_gv. 30, Issue 3, June 2021, p. 86-98
_s
942 _cART