000 | 01604nab a2200265 c 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
999 |
_c143884 _d143884 |
||
003 | ES-MaIEF | ||
005 | 20210414182349.0 | ||
007 | ta | ||
008 | 210414t2021 sp ||||| |||| 00| 0|spa d | ||
040 |
_aES-MaIEF _bspa _cES-MaIEF |
||
100 | 1 |
_963454 _aKuzniacki, Blazej |
|
245 | 0 |
_aPoland's implementation of EU GAAR compromises constitutional and EU principles _c Blazej Kuzniacki |
|
260 | _c2021 | ||
500 | _aResumen. | ||
520 | _aOne of the most potent legal instruments for preventing tax avoidance is Article 6 (general anti-avoidance rule, EU GAAR) of the Anti-Tax Avoidance Directive (ATAD). This article analyses Poland's very restrictive implementation of the EU GAAR to demonstrate that the implementation, although permissible under Article 3 ATAD, has led to the protection of the Polish tax base at the cost of constitutional and EU principles. The main purpose of this article is to reveal the incompatibility of the Polish GAAR with the constitutional and EU principles of legal certainty and proportionality and to draw consequences from it. Furthermore, the article aims to show that the EU should have taken a different approach to the EU standard for abuse of tax law. | ||
650 | 4 |
_967421 _aATAD |
|
650 | 4 |
_943410 _aELUSION FISCAL |
|
650 | 4 |
_954712 _aPREVENCIÓN |
|
650 | 4 |
_953911 _aINCUMPLIMIENTO DEL DERECHO COMUNITARIO |
|
650 | 4 |
_954031 _aPRINCIPIO DE PROPORCIONALIDAD |
|
650 | 4 |
_948075 _aPOLONIA |
|
650 | 4 |
_967756 _aUNION EUROPEA |
|
773 | 0 |
_9164647 _oOP 2141/2021/3 _tIntertax _w(IEF)55619 _x 0165-2826 _gv. 49, n. 3, March 2021, p. 237-253 |
|
942 | _cART |