000 02593nab a2200253 c 4500
999 _c143876
_d143876
003 ES-MaIEF
005 20210414130941.0
007 ta
008 210414t2021 sp ||||| |||| 00| 0|spa d
040 _aES-MaIEF
_bspa
_cES-MaIEF
100 1 _968861
_aRojszczak, Marcin
245 0 _aCompliance of automatic tax fraud detection systems with the right to privacy standards based on the Polish experience of the STIR system
_c Marcin Rojszczak
260 _c2021
500 _aResumen.
520 _aAccording to the EC estimates presented in November 2018, the so-called VAT gap amounted to approximately EUR 150 billion with organized crime groups largely responsible for its creation. Therefore, it is not surprising that states, while protecting their economic interests, are implementing new measures aimed at detecting and preventing tax crime. Poland is also pursuing this type of activity, and a number of innovative measures in the field of tax law have been introduced over the last few years. One such solution is the automatic system of analysing transaction data from financial institutions (System Teleinformatyczny Izby Rozliczeniowej, STIR). The way this system works – combining the collection of enormous sets of personal data including sensitive information with confidential analytics and composing reports for tax authorities and law enforcement purposes – must raise doubts as to its compliance with human rights standards. In terms of its operation, STIR resembles electronic surveillance systems in other EU Member States; the difference is that, instead of capturing telecommunications data, it aggregates bulk amounts of information on financial transactions. The purpose of this article is to discuss the regulations that establish the legal framework of STIR and to present recommendations on how to ensure its compliance with the privacy and data protection model functioning in the EU. Special attention will be paid to assessing the proportionality and quality of legal safeguards implemented to limit the risk of abuse of power according to standards established in the case law of the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) and the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU).
650 4 _aFRAUDE FISCAL
_944482
650 4 _950141
_aIMPUESTO SOBRE EL VALOR AÑADIDO
650 4 _942622
_aPREVENCIÓN
650 4 _941864
_aDERECHO A LA INTIMIDAD
650 4 _948171
_aPROTECCION DE DATOS
650 4 _948075
_aPOLONIA
773 0 _9164652
_oOP 2141/2021/1
_tIntertax
_w(IEF)55619
_x 0165-2826
_gv. 49, n. 1, January 2021, p. 39-52
942 _cART