000 | 01643nab a2200277 c 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
999 |
_c143713 _d143713 |
||
003 | ES-MaIEF | ||
005 | 20210310121734.0 | ||
007 | ta | ||
008 | 210309t2021 ne ||||| |||| 00| 0|eng d | ||
040 |
_aES-MaIEF _bspa _cES-MaIEF |
||
100 | 1 |
_966595 _aBahçeci, Baris |
|
245 | 0 |
_aIs there a special enforced tax collection regime under the ECtHR case law ? _c Barıs Bahçeci |
|
260 | _c2021 | ||
500 | _aDisponible también en formato electrónico. | ||
500 | _aResumen. | ||
520 | _aDuring 2020, the OECD and the EU Commission have separately unveiled two proposals both laying down new rules for reporting of tax information by sharing and gig economy platforms. Although the template used for tax reporting by sharing and gig economy platforms is nearly the same, some differences can be noted by a close reading and comparison of the text under the two initiatives. In this article, the author analyses the new rules for reporting by sharing and gig economy platforms that the OECD and the EU have separately released in the first half of 2020, retraces the common rationale behind the proposed introduction of the new rules, and explains similarities and differences existing between the two initiatives. | ||
650 | 4 |
_aRECAUDACION _948197 |
|
650 | 4 |
_aIMPUESTOS _910750 |
|
650 | 4 |
_aDEUDA TRIBUTARIA _942651 |
|
650 | 4 |
_aESFUERZO FISCAL _943747 |
|
650 | 4 |
_954031 _aPRINCIPIO DE PROPORCIONALIDAD |
|
650 |
_aUNION EUROPEA _948644 |
||
650 |
_aJURISPRUDENCIA _947570 |
||
773 | 0 |
_9164464 _oOP 2141-B/2021/1 _tEC Tax Review _w(IEF)124968 _x 0928-2750 [print] _gv. 30, Issue 1, February 2021, p. 39-47 |
|
942 | _cART |