000 01834nab a2200325 c 4500
999 _c143522
_d143522
003 ES-MaIEF
005 20210204124503.0
007 ta
008 210204t2020 uk ||||| |||| 00| 0|eng d
040 _aES-MaIEF
_bspa
_cES-MaIEF
100 0 _968713
_aSuphanit Piyapromdee‏
245 4 _aThe income and consumption effects of COVID-19 and the role of public policy
_c Suphanit‏ Piyapromdee and Peter Spittal
260 _c2020
500 _aDisponible también en formato electrónico.
500 _aResumen.
504 _aBibliografía.
520 _aWe provide empirical evidence on the labour market impacts of COVID-19 in the UK and assess the effectiveness of mitigation policies. We estimate the relationship between employment outcomes and occupational and industrial characteristics and assess the effects on consumption. Seventy per cent of households in the bottom fifth of the earnings distribution hold insufficient assets to maintain current spending for more than one week. We compare the effectiveness of the UK’s Coronavirus Job Retention Scheme and of Economic Impact Payments in the US. The EIPs are more effective at mitigating consumption reductions as they have full coverage, depend on household structure and are higher for low-income workers.
650 _aPANDEMIAS
_967998
650 _aCORONAVIRUS
_967999
650 _aCRISIS ECONOMICAS
_941525
650 _aEMPLEO
_943494
650 4 _947734
_aMERCADO DE TRABAJO
650 _aCONSUMO
_940658
650 4 _948072
_aPOLITICAS PUBLICAS
650 4 _948241
_aREINO UNIDO
700 1 _968714
_aSpittal, Peter
773 0 _9164224
_oOP 1472/2020/4
_tFiscal Studies
_w(IEF)55561
_x 0143-5671 [papel]
_gv. 41, n. 4, December 2020, p. 805-827
856 _uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1475-5890.12252
942 _cART