000			01843nab a2200289 c 4500
999			_c142981 _d142981
003			ES-MaIEF
005			20201014124342.0
007			ta
008			201014t2020 us ||||| |||| 00| 0|eng d
040			_aES-MaIEF _bspa _cES-MaIEF
041			_aeng
100	1		_9168 _aGordon, Nora
245		4	_aFederal aid to school districts during the COVID-19 recession _c Nora Gordon and Sarah Reber
260			_c2020
500			_aResumen.
504			_aBibliografía.
520			_aThe coronavirus has created an enormous, and expensive, challenge for elementary and secondary schools while simultaneously depleting the revenue sources on which public schools depend. During the Great Recession, the federal government filled in a significant share of lost revenue. In contrast, the federal response to date has been limited. If Congress decides to invest in future generations, it faces a range of options for how to structure an aid package. One key aspect for any stabilization package is how federal funds should be allocated to states. We consider the types of approaches used in recent proposals, during the Great Recession, and at the onset of the COVID-19 crisis, as well as in major ongoing federal education programs for compensatory and special education. We simulate the distribution of funds and show the considerable difference in how per-child allocations correlate with child poverty rates under the most likely alternative approaches.
650			_aPANDEMIAS _967998
650			_aCORONAVIRUS _967999
650		4	_aEDUCACION _943264
650		4	_aGASTOS EN EDUCACION _944900
650		4	_aAYUDA ESTATAL _932236
650		4	_aESTADOS UNIDOS _942888
700	1		_936999 _aReber, Sarah
773	0		_9163516 _oOP 233/2020/3 _tNational Tax Journal _w(IEF)86491 _x 0028-0283 _gv. 73, n. 3, September 2020, p. 781-804
942			_cART