000 01304nab a2200289 c 4500
999 _c142440
_d142440
003 ES-MaIEF
005 20220805131901.0
007 ta
008 200826t2020 us ||||| |||| 00| 0|eng d
040 _aES-MaIEF
_bspa
_cES-MaIEF
041 _aeng
100 1 _aKandev, Michael
_914642
245 0 _aCanadian Appeal Court rejects government's treaty-shopping arguments against Luxembourg holding company
_c by Michael N. Kandev and Jesse A. Boretsky
260 _c2020
500 _aDisponible también en formato electrónico.
500 _aResumen.
520 _aIn this article, the authors discuss the Canadian Federal Court of Appeal's judgment in Alta Energy, focusing on its effect on Canada's application of general antiabuse rules against contested treaty benefit claims and the OECD multilateral instrument's principal purpose test on perceived treaty shopping.
650 4 _948268
_aIMPUESTOS
650 4 _aTRATADOS INTERNACIONALES
_948608
650 4 _aABUSO DE TRATADOS
_963564
650 _aELUSION FISCAL
_943410
650 4 _aCANADA
_933508
650 _aJURISPRUDENCIA
_942888
700 1 _968193
_aBoretsky, Jesse A.
773 0 _9162486
_oOP 138-Bis/2020/98/11
_tTax Notes International
_w(IEF)124525
_x 1048-3306
_gv. 98, n. 11, June 15, 2020, p. 1245-1249
942 _cART