000			01725nab a2200289 c 4500
999			_c142362 _d142362
003			ES-MaIEF
005			20200818130738.0
007			ta
008			200818t2020 us ||||| |||| 00| 0|eng d
040			_aES-MaIEF _bspa _cES-MaIEF
041			_aeng
100	1		_968133 _aPark, Sungho‏
245		0	_aInterlocal collaboration and local fiscal structure _bdo state incentives matter? _c Sungho Park, Craig S. Maher and Carol Ebdon
260			_c2020
500			_aDisponible también en formato electrónico.
500			_aResumen.
504			_aBibliografía.
520			_aInterlocal collaboration is considered an important tool for cost‐saving. States, therefore, have incentivized interlocal collaboration in different ways. To understand the budgetary consequences of interlocal collaboration and state incentives, we examine counties in Nebraska where the State uses two incentive mechanisms—resource restrictions and additional access to restricted revenues granted to counties with collaboration. This study finds that county expenditures are lower when they spend more through collaboration. While this lower spending is related to lower revenues in counties less constrained by state restrictions, the results for counties more constrained are unclear. State incentive structures may matter for such variations.
650			_aHACIENDAS LOCALES _945217
650			_aTRIBUTOS LOCALES _948620
650		4	_953912 _aCOOPERACIÓN ADMINISTRATIVA
650			_aESTADOS UNIDOS _942888
700	1		_966097 _aMaher, Craig S.
700	1		_956692 _aEbdon, Carol
773	0		_9162720 _oOP 1716/2020/2 _tPublic Budgeting and Finance _w(IEF)90019 _x 0275-1100 _gv. 40, n. 2, Summer 2020, p. 20-43
942			_cART