| 000 | 01642nab a2200265 c 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 999 |
_c141934 _d141934 |
||
| 003 | ES-MaIEF | ||
| 005 | 20200226130316.0 | ||
| 007 | ta | ||
| 008 | 200226t2020 us ||||| |||| 00| 0|eng d | ||
| 040 |
_aES-MaIEF _bspa _cES-MaIEF |
||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 100 | 1 |
_967902 _aKuran, Timur |
|
| 245 | 0 |
_aZakat _b Islam's missed opportunity to limit predatory taxation _c Timur Kuran |
|
| 260 | _c2020 | ||
| 500 | _aDisponible también en formato electrónico | ||
| 500 | _aResumen. | ||
| 504 | _aBibliografía. | ||
| 520 | _aOne of Islam’s five canonical pillars is a predictable, fixed, and mildly progressive tax system called zakat. It was meant to finance various causes typical of a pre-modern government. Implicit in the entire transfer system was personal property rights as well as constraints on government—two key elements of a liberal order. Those features could have provided the starting point for broadening political liberties under a state with explicitly restricted functions. Instead, just a few decades after the rise of Islam, zakat opened the door to arbitrary political rule and material insecurity. A major reason is that the Quran does not make explicit the underlying principles of governance. It simply outlines the specifics of zakat as they related to conditions in seventh-century Arabia. | ||
| 650 |
_aIMPUESTOS _947460 |
||
| 650 |
_aSISTEMA FISCAL _948426 |
||
| 650 | 4 |
_aISLAM _947155 |
|
| 773 | 0 |
_9162030 _oOP 1443/2020/182/3/4 _tPublic Choice _w(IEF)124378 _x 0048-5829 _g v. 182, n. 3-4, March 2020, p. 395-416 |
|
| 856 | _uhttps://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11127-019-00663-x | ||
| 942 | _cART | ||