000 01919nab a2200301 c 4500
999 _c141599
_d141599
003 ES-MaIEF
005 20200113135115.0
007 ta
008 200113t2019 ne ||||| |||| 00| 0|eng d
040 _aES-MaIEF
_bspa
_cES-MaIEF
041 _aeng
100 1 _963589
_aMelis, Giuseppe
245 4 _aThe EU blacklist
_c Giuseppe Melis & Alessio Persiani
_ba step forward bur still much to do
260 _c2019
500 _aResumen.
520 _aIn 2016 the EU decided to adopt an EU blacklist of non-cooperative third country jurisdictions with the view of establishing a common approach of EU Member States in this area. This constitutes a first and positive step towards a deeper coordination of EU tax systems in the highly-sensitive area of identification of tax havens. However, further coordination through an institutionalized tax coordination process seems to be desirable, also in order to increase the transparency of the negotiating process between EU institutions and non-cooperative jurisdictions. A further step in the EU tax coordination process should regard tax competition measures having a general scope of application adopted by EU Member States: some arguments in order to contrast these regimes could be derived from international provisions adopted at UN level and, more specifically, from Art. 2, para. 1 of the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights.
650 4 _950141
_aCOLABORACION TRIBUTARIA
650 4 _948591
_aARMONIZACION FISCAL
650 4 _91174
_aADMINISTRACION TRIBUTARIA
650 4 _aARMONIZACION
_948611
650 4 _aPARAISOS FISCALES
_947950
650 4 _aEVASION FISCAL
_944029
650 4 _aPREVENCIÓN
_954712
650 _aUNION EUROPEA
_948644
700 1 _959288
_aPersiani, Alessio
773 0 _9161585
_oOP 2141-B/2019/5
_tEC Tax Review
_w(IEF)124968
_x 0928-2750 [print]
_g v. 28, n. 5, October 2019, p. 253-263
942 _cART