| 000 | 01239nab a2200277 c 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 999 |
_c141466 _d141466 |
||
| 003 | ES-MaIEF | ||
| 005 | 20221003184344.0 | ||
| 007 | ta | ||
| 008 | 191128t2019 us ||||| |||| 00| 0|eng d | ||
| 040 |
_aES-MaIEF _bspa _cES-MaIEF |
||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 100 | 1 |
_aJensen, Erik M. _948792 |
|
| 245 | 4 |
_aThe IRS can't use a notice to change statutory meaning in an anti - taxpayer way _bFeigh v. Commissioner _cErik M. Jensen |
|
| 260 | _c2019 | ||
| 500 | _aDisponible también en formato electrónico. | ||
| 500 | _aResumen. | ||
| 520 | _aFeigh v. Commissioner, decided in May 2019, has interesting things to say about whether the Internal Revenue Service can take away otherwise available tax benefi ts by issuing a notice and whether any deference should be accorded statutory interpretation contained in a notice. | ||
| 650 | 4 |
_944146 _aFAMILIA |
|
| 650 | 4 |
_aIMPUESTOS _946896 |
|
| 650 | 4 |
_aGASTOS FISCALES _947647 |
|
| 650 |
_aESTADOS UNIDOS _942888 |
||
| 650 |
_aJURISPRUDENCIA _947570 |
||
| 773 | 0 |
_9161285 _oOP 235/2019/1 _tJournal of Taxation of Investments _w(IEF)51921 _x 0747-9115 _g v. 37, n. 1, Fall 2019, p. 75-83 |
|
| 856 | _uhttps://www.civicresearchinstitute.com/online/PDF/%20JTI-3701-06-Feigh.pdf | ||
| 942 | _cART | ||