000			01670nab a2200289 c 4500
999			_c141292 _d141292
003			ES-MaIEF
005			20230614155401.0
007			ta
008			191015s2019 us ||||| |||| 00| 0|eng d
040			_aES-MaIEF _bspa _cES-MaIEF
041			_aeng
100	1		_965459 _aLeiser, Stephanie
245		0	_aLocal government fiscal health _bcomparing self - assessments to conventional measures _c Stephanie Leiser and Sarah Mills
260			_c2019
500			_aResumen.
504			_aBibliografía.
520			_aMunicipal fiscal condition is typically assessed using objective financial indicators, but little is understood about how local officials subjectively evaluate their own fiscal health. Using both qualitative and quantitative approaches to analyze survey data from Michigan, we explore how local officials conceptualize fiscal health and compare self-assessments with conventional financial indicators. The results reveal that local officials emphasize long-run issues and external stressors, but the relative importance of different factors varies depending on whether they report high or low fiscal stress. We suggest that self-assessments may be a useful supplement to conventional objective measures in capturing "true" fiscal health.
650		4	_948620 _aTRIBUTOS LOCALES
650		4	_97978 _aIMPOSICION OPTIMA
650		4	_943700 _aEQUIDAD IMPOSITIVA
650		4	_944633 _aFUNCIONARIOS LOCALES
650		4	_943608 _aENCUESTAS
650			_aESTADOS UNIDOS _942888
700	1		_967578 _aMills, Sarah
773	0		_9161224 _oOP 1716/2019/3 _tPublic Budgeting and Finance _w(IEF)90019 _x 0275-1100 _g v. 39, n. 3, Fall 2019, p. 75-95
942			_cART