000 01201nab a2200253 c 4500
999 _c141157
_d141157
003 ES-MaIEF
005 20230614152146.0
007 ta
008 190924s2019 ne ||||| |||| 00| 0|eng d
040 _aES-MaIEF
_bspa
_cES-MaIEF
041 _aeng
100 1 _943255
_aGaroupa, Nuno
245 0 _aDomestic tax arbitration
_bsome economic considerations
_c Nuno Garoupa
260 _c2019
500 _aResumen.
520 _aIn this article, the author discusses the economic arguments for and against domestic tax arbitration. Beyond the standard benefits and costs widely discussed by the literature on private arbitration, he emphasizes two additional concerns: agency costs (because there is a significant principal-agent problem within the government) and fast lane effect (less public investment in improving tax courts).
650 4 _942375
_aDERECHO TRIBUTARIO
650 4 _944303
_aFISCALIDAD INTERNACIONAL
650 4 _928417
_aARBITRAJE
650 7 _966265
_aRESOLUCIONES EXTRAJUDICIALES DE CONFLICTOS
650 4 _aUNION EUROPEA
_948644
773 0 _9161017
_oOP 2141/2019/8/9
_tIntertax
_w(IEF)55619
_x 0165-2826
_g v. 47, n. 8/9, August / September 2019, p. 760-765
942 _cART