000 02228nab a2200289 c 4500
999 _c141118
_d141118
003 ES-MaIEF
005 20230614145953.0
007 ta
008 190918t2019 us ||||| |||| 00| 0|eng d
040 _aES-MaIEF
_cES-MaIEF
100 1 _aGrodem, Anne Skevik
_967480
245 0 _aNetworking, lobbying and bargaining for pension
_btrade union power in the Norwegian pension reform
_c Anne Skevik Grodem and Jon M. Hippe
260 _c2019
500 _aDisponible también en formato electrónico en la Biblioteca del IEF.
500 _aResumen.
504 _aBibliografía.
520 _aNorway reformed its pension system in 2011, introducing a Swedish-style, NDC system. Contrary to expectations, the reform was largely supported by the dominant confederation of trade unions, the LO. In this article, we look at LO involvement in the process at different stages. Through qualitative interviews with key reform architects, we have traced the process between 2005 and 2008, emphasising actors, meeting places and interests. Starting from the insight that unions can influence through lobbying, bargaining and (the threat of) mobilising, we suggest that lobbying can be a mutual process, where parties and unions move each other’s positions. In addition, bargaining can take the form of behind-the-scenes cooperation, as well as of negotiations in the classic, Nordic-style industrial relations sense. Expanding on this framework, we suggest that the literature on pension reforms should pay more attention to negotiated and voluntary labour market occupational schemes, and to the importance of expertise and networks.
650 4 _948000
_aPENSIONES
650 4 _942072
_aREFORMA
650 4 _aSINDICATOS
_942374
650 4 _aNEGOCIACION
_947823
650 4 _aNORUEGA
_947841
700 _aHippe, Jon M.
_967481
773 0 _9161015
_oOP 1793/2019/3
_tJournal of Public Policy
_w(IEF)17584
_x 0143-814X
_g v. 39, issue 3, September 2019, p. 465-481
856 _uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/57361363FFE214EE466DD3F8AD4409DC/S0143814X18000144a.pdf/networking_lobbying_and_bargaining_for_pensions_trade_union_power_in_the_norwegian_pension_reform.pdf
942 _cART