000 | 01995nab a2200277 c 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
003 | ES-MaIEF | ||
005 | 20190822134942.0 | ||
007 | ta | ||
008 | 190822s2019 us ||||| |||| 00| 0|eng d | ||
040 |
_aES-MaIEF _bspa _cES-MaIEF |
||
041 | _aeng | ||
100 | 1 |
_959786 _aFichtenbaum, Mark |
|
245 | 0 |
_aTax chaos for traders in index options _c Mark Fichtenbaum |
|
260 | _c2019 | ||
500 | _aDisponible también en formato electrónico en la Biblioteca del IEF. | ||
500 | _aResumen. | ||
520 | _aWhat happens when you put a tax person in charge of determining the fair market value (FMV) of an index option, and the experts on option trading defer to that person? Chaos. Exchange traded index options are generally treated as Section 1256 contracts, and their value is determined following Treasury regulations. Because the regulations weren’t written with index options in mind, however, the valuation can be tricky. This article explains how tax results in 2018 were skewed for some investors, and why there may be more problems in the future if some taxpayers decide to game the system. Tens of millions, if not substantially more, of phantom gains and losses are being reported to investors and the IRS via Forms 1099. Even relatively small investors are having millions of dollars of gains reported that never existed, realized or unrealized. Others are having a similar amount of phantom losses reported. Instead of being a zero sum game, this convention creates tax chaos for investors and revenue issues for the federal governments. | ||
650 | 4 |
_947531 _aINVERSIONES |
|
650 | 4 |
_aIMPUESTOS _947460 |
|
650 | 4 |
_aDECLARACIONES TRIBUTARIAS _941766 |
|
650 | 4 |
_aELUSION FISCAL _943410 |
|
650 |
_aESTADOS UNIDOS _942888 |
||
773 | 0 |
_9160915 _oOP 235/2019/4 _tJournal of Taxation of Investments _w(IEF)51921 _x 0747-9115 _g v. 36, n. 4, Summer 2019, p. 17-21 |
|
856 | _uhttps://www.civicresearchinstitute.com/online/PDF/JTI-3604-02-Index%20Options.pdf | ||
942 | _cART | ||
999 |
_c141043 _d141043 |