| 000 | 01470nab a2200229 c 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 999 |
_c140977 _d140977 |
||
| 003 | ES-MaIEF | ||
| 005 | 20230614141121.0 | ||
| 007 | ta | ||
| 008 | 190812s2019 us ||||| |||| 00| 0|eng d | ||
| 040 |
_aES-MaIEF _bspa _cES-MaIEF |
||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 100 | 1 |
_967398 _aMartínez Guzmán, Juan Pablo |
|
| 245 | 0 |
_aCan centralized performance budgeting systems be useful for line ministries? _bevidence from Chile _c Juan Pablo Martínez Guzmán |
|
| 260 | _c2019 | ||
| 500 | _aResumen. | ||
| 504 | _aBibliografía. | ||
| 520 | _aMany governments that have implemented performance budgeting systems have followed a centralized, top‐down approach that makes them foreign to the needs of line ministries. In this study, the author analyzes the case of Chile, which despite its top‐down approach, is often regarded as successful. Our findings suggest that while top‐down performance budgeting systems often fail to meet the needs of individual ministries and are prone to principal‐agent issues, under certain conditions—such as involving third‐party experts and having a professional civil service—the performance information from those systems might still be useful and/or might generate positive spillovers for line ministries. | ||
| 650 | 4 |
_954427 _aPRESUPUESTOS POR TAREAS |
|
| 650 | 4 |
_aCHILE _92961 |
|
| 773 | 0 |
_9160724 _oOP 1716/2019/2 _tPublic Budgeting and Finance _w(IEF)90019 _x 0275-1100 _g v. 39, n. 2, Summer 2019, p. 23-43 |
|
| 942 | _cART | ||