000 01320nab a2200289 c 4500
003 ES-MaIEF
005 20181010142000.0
007 ta
008 180927s2018 ne |||woo|||| 00| 0|eng d
040 _aES-MaIEF
_bspa
_cES-MaIEF
041 _aeng
100 1 _962581
_aJain, Saurabh
245 0 _aHistorical introduction to the test of dominion in the context of double tax treaties
_cSaurabh Jain and John Prebble
260 _c2018
500 _aDisponible únicamente en formato electrónico.
500 _aResumen.
520 _aThe term "dominion" represents the right to decide how to use income or property. Courts have considered the presence of dominion to conclusively indicate that an interposed company is the beneficial owner and therefore entitled to treaty benefits. This article analyses from a historical perspective how dominion developed as a test in conduit company cases.
650 4 _942842
_aDOBLE IMPOSICION
650 4 _948168
_aPROPIEDAD
650 4 _947460
_aIMPUESTOS
650 4 _948454
_aSOCIEDADES
650 4 _959746
_aBENEFICIARIO EFECTIVO
650 4 _948608
_aTRATADOS INTERNACIONALES
773 0 _974442
_oBIT
_tBulletin for International Taxation
_w(IEF)65686
_x 0007-4624
_g v. 72, n. 8, August 2018, p. 488-492
856 _uhttps://online.ibfd.org/kbase/
942 _cRE
999 _c139059
_d139059