000 01442nab a2200289 c 4500
003 ES-MaIEF
005 20181005144950.0
007 ta
008 181005t2018 uk ||||| |||| 00| 0|eng d
040 _aES-MaIEF
_bspa
_cES-MaIEF
041 _aeng
100 1 _966577
_aDafermos, Yannis
245 0 _aDebt cycles, unstability and fiscal rules
_b : a Godley-Minsky synthesis
_c Yannis Defermos
260 _c2018
500 _aDisponible también en formato electrónico a través de la Biblioteca del IEF.
500 _aResumen.
500 _aApéndice.
504 _aBibliografía.
520 _aThis paper examines Friedman’s writings in the years 1941–43 and compares them with those after the war with a view to assessing differences and similarities. Albeit a first assessment, Friedman’s claim that he was suffering from a ‘Keynesian illness’ in his ‘Washington phase’ appears to have been less ‘serious’ and deep than he himself feared, although he was to some extent influenced by the ‘prevailing Keynesian temper of the time’.
650 4 _934579
_aCICLOS ECONOMICOS
650 4 _942647
_aDEUDA PUBLICA
650 _aIMPUESTOS
_947460
650 4 _944787
_aGASTO PUBLICO
773 0 _9157634
_oOP 1352/2018/5
_tCambridge Journal of Economics
_w(IEF)69181
_x 0309-166X
_g v. 42, n. 5, September 2018, p. 1277-1313
856 _uhttps://academic.oup.com/cje/article/42/5/1277/4775276
942 _cART
999 _c139012
_d139012