000 01786nab a2200313 c 4500
999 _c138682
_d138682
003 ES-MaIEF
005 20200930101334.0
007 ta
008 180824s2018 ne ||||| |||| 00| 0|eng d
040 _aES-MaIEF
_bapa
_cES-MaIEF
041 _aeng
100 1 _961628
_aChand, Vikram
245 4 _aThe interaction of the principal purpose test (and the guiding principle) with treaty and domestic anti-avoidance rules
_c Vikram Chand
260 _c2018
504 _aBibliografía.
520 _aIn this contribution, the author, firstly, discusses the interaction of the principal purpose test (PPT) with the inherent anti-abuse rule. Secondly, the author discusses the relationship of the PPT with existing treaty general anti-avoidance rules (GAARs) and specific anti-avoidance rules (SAARs) such as the limitation of benefits (LoB) clause, the beneficial ownership clause, holding/time period provisions introduced in the articles dealing with dividends/capital gains as well as the anti-abuse rule with respect to permanent establishments (PEs) in a third State. Lastly, the author analyses the interaction of the PPT with domestic anti-avoidance rules such as judicial doctrines, statutory GAARs and SAARs.
650 4 _963148
_aEROSIÓN DE LA BASE IMPONIBLE Y TRASLADO DE BENEFICIOS
650 4 _aEVASION FISCAL
_944029
650 4 _aPREVENCION
_954712
650 4 _948158
_aPROGRAMAS
650 4 _927355
_aAPLICACION
650 4 _aCONVENIOS
_941141
650 4 _aTRATADOS INTERNACIONALES
_948608
650 4 _aCLÁUSULA DEL PROPÓSITO PRINCIPAL
_967871
650 4 _944303
_aFISCALIDAD INTERNACIONAL
650 4 _943410
_aELUSION FISCAL
773 0 _9156926
_oOP 2141/2018/2
_tIntertax
_w(IEF)55619
_x 0165-2826
_g v. 46, n. 2, February 2018, p. 115-123
942 _cART