| 000 | 01982nab a2200301 c 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 999 |
_c137562 _d137562 |
||
| 003 | ES-MaIEF | ||
| 005 | 20221212155357.0 | ||
| 007 | ta | ||
| 008 | 180316t2018 uk ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 040 |
_aES-MaIEF _cES-MaIEF |
||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 100 | 1 |
_962811 _aAfonso, Whitney B. |
|
| 245 | 4 |
_aThe effect of a state income tax on migration _bthe example of Connecticut _c Whitney B. Afonso |
|
| 260 | _c2018 | ||
| 500 | _aDisponible en formato electrónico a través de la Biblioteca del IEF. | ||
| 500 | _aResumen. | ||
| 504 | _aBibliografía. | ||
| 520 | _aState-level income tax policy is a hotly debated topic in both academic and political spheres. Although economic theory and some empirical analyses suggest that larger income tax burdens affect migration decisions, there is also a good deal of empirical evidence showing that tax policy has little to no effect. This lack of consensus in the academic literature is echoed in the political world, where many states are debating whether to eliminate income taxes or reduce rates as a means of spurring economic growth. Connecticut’s adoption of an income tax policy in 1991 provides a unique opportunity to analyse the impact of a sizable income tax policy change on migration. The results suggest that Connecticut’s income tax deterred movement into the state but had no impact on exit from the state, resulting in a net loss in migration. | ||
| 650 | 4 |
_950200 _aRENTA |
|
| 650 | 4 |
_947460 _aIMPUESTOS |
|
| 650 | 4 |
_948102 _aPRESION FISCAL |
|
| 650 | 4 |
_947837 _aNO RESIDENTES |
|
| 650 | 4 |
_947325 _aINMIGRACION |
|
| 650 | 4 |
_942888 _aESTADOS UNIDOS |
|
| 773 | 0 |
_9155428 _tJournal of Public Policy _w(IEF)17584 _x 0143-814X _g v. 38, issue 1, December 2018, p. 113-140 |
|
| 856 | _uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/8009349DA1F8F4056B5DE0C761996CF9/S0143814X16000234a.pdf/effect_of_a_state_income_tax_on_migration_the_example_of_connecticut.pdf | ||
| 942 |
_2udc _cART |
||