000 | 01843nab#a2200301#c#4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
003 | IEF | ||
005 | 20180219173306.0 | ||
008 | 170420s2017 GBR|| #####0 b|ENG|u | ||
040 | _aIEF | ||
041 | _aENG | ||
100 | 1 |
_aLewis, Blane D. _965323 |
|
245 |
_aIntergovernmental fiscal transfer and local incentives and responses _b the case of Indonesia _c Blane D. Lewis and Paul Smoke |
||
260 | _c2017 | ||
500 | _aDisponible en formato electrónico a través de la Biblioteca del IEF. Resumen. Conclusión. Bibliografía. | ||
650 | 4 |
_aADMINISTRACION TRIBUTARIA _97307 |
|
650 | 4 |
_aCOLABORACION TRIBUTARIA _937635 |
|
650 | 4 |
_aCOOPERACIÓN ADMINISTRATIVA _953912 |
|
650 | 4 |
_aCORRESPONSABILIDAD FISCAL _941325 |
|
650 | 4 |
_aHACIENDAS LOCALES _945217 |
|
650 | 4 |
_aINCENTIVOS FISCALES _947462 |
|
650 | 4 |
_aINDONESIA _947477 |
|
520 | _aIndonesian policymakers are convinced that a number of perverse incentives are embedded in their system of intergovernmental transfers. Officials in countries throughout the developing world have similar views about their own intergovernmental frameworks. In Indonesia, perverse incentives are thought to negatively influence a wide range of local government fiscal behaviours, including as regards own-source revenues, spending and savings. An empirical analysis ofthe local government response to transfers, however, offers only mixed support for the existence and strength of the presumed incentives. Overall, the findingsin this paper highlight the benefits to central governments of rigorously examining assumed perverse incentives in their intergovernmental frameworks before embarking on attempts to expunge them. | ||
700 | 1 |
_aSmoke, Paul _965324 |
|
773 | 0 |
_tFiscal Studies _w55561 _gv. 38, n. 1, March 2017, p. 111-139 |
|
942 | _cART | ||
942 | _z147808 | ||
999 |
_c129236 _d129236 |