| 000 | 01864nab#a2200301#c#4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | IEF | ||
| 005 | 20180219170110.0 | ||
| 008 | 171018s2017 GBR|| #####0 b|ENG|u | ||
| 040 | _aIEF | ||
| 041 | _aENG | ||
| 100 | 1 |
_aGeyer, Johannes _956302 |
|
| 245 |
_aIndirect fiscal effects of long - term care insurance _c Johannes Geyer, Peter Haan and Thorben Korfhage |
||
| 260 | _c2017 | ||
| 500 | _aDisponible en formato electrónico a través de la Biblioteca del IEF. Resumen. Conclusión. Bibliografía. | ||
| 650 | 4 |
_aCUIDADOS DE LARGA DURACIÓN _963760 |
|
| 650 | 4 |
_aFINANCIACION _944260 |
|
| 650 | 4 |
_aIMPUESTOS _947460 |
|
| 650 | 4 |
_aPRESUPUESTOS FAMILIARES _948113 |
|
| 650 | 4 |
_aSEGUROS DE SALUD _948380 |
|
| 650 | 4 |
_aMODELOS ECONOMETRICOS _947776 |
|
| 520 | _aInformal care by close family members is the main pillar of most long-term care systems. However, due to demographic ageing, the need for long-term care is expected to increase while the informal care potential is expected to decline. From a budgetary perspective, informal care is often viewed as a costsaving alternative to subsidised formal care. This view, however, neglects that many family carers are of working age and face the difficulty of reconcilingcareand paid work, which might entail sizeable indirect fiscal effects related to forgone tax revenues, lower social security contributions and higher transfer payments. In this paper, we use a structural model of labour supply and thechoiceof care arrangement to quantify these indirect fiscal effects of informal care.Moreover, based on the model, we discuss the fiscal effects related to non-take-up of formal care. | ||
| 700 | 1 |
_aHaan, Peter _956288 |
|
| 700 | 1 |
_aKorfhage, Thorben _956376 |
|
| 773 | 0 |
_tFiscal Studies _w55561 _gv. 38, n. 3, September 2017, p. 393-415 |
|
| 942 | _cART | ||
| 942 | _z148693 | ||
| 999 |
_c102960 _d102960 |
||