000			01805nab#a2200301#c#4500
003			IEF
005			20180219170108.0
008			170626s2017 GBR|| #####0 b|ENG|u
040			_aIEF
041			_aENG
100	1		_aAdvani, Arun _961939
245			_aCheaper, greener and more efficient _b rationalising UK carbon prices _c Arun Advani and George Stoye
260			_c2017
500			_aDisponible en formato electrónico a través de la Biblioteca del IEF. Resumen. Conclusión. Bibliografía.
650		4	_aPOLITICA ENERGETICA _948058
650		4	_aCARBON _933524
650		4	_aCONTAMINACION ATMOSFERICA _940897
650		4	_aREDUCCION _948220
650		4	_aIMPUESTOS _947460
650		4	_aPRECIOS _948092
650		4	_aREINO UNIDO _948241
520			_aCurrent UK energy use policies, which primarily aim to reduce carbón emissions, provide abatement incentives that vary by user and fuel, creating inefficiency. Distributional concerns are often given as a justification for thelower carbon price faced by households, but there is little rationale for carbonprices associated with the use of gas to be lower than those for electricity.We consider reforms that raise carbon prices faced by households and reduce the variation in carbon prices across gas and electricity use, improving the efficiency of emissions reduction. We show that the revenue raised from thesereforms can be recycled in a way that ameliorates some of the distributionalconcerns. Whilst such recycling is not able to protect all poorer households, existing policy also makes distributional trade-offs, but does so in an opaque and inefficient way.
700	1		_aStoye, George _965494
773	0		_tFiscal Studies _w55561 _gv. 38, n. 2, June 2017, p. 269-299
942			_cART
942			_z148199
999			_c102932 _d102932