Court ruling reignites the SAAR vs GAAR debate in India by Aditya Singh Chandel and Akshat Jain
By: Singh Chandel, Aditya
.
Contributor(s): Jain, Akshat
.
Material type: 




Item type | Current location | Home library | Call number | Status | Date due | Barcode |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Artículos | IEF | IEF | OP 138-Bis/2024/115/8-2 (Browse shelf) | Available | OP 138-Bis/2024/115/8-2 |
Browsing IEF Shelves Close shelf browser
No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | ||
OP 138-Bis/2024/115/7-3 Taxation of foreign income earned by individuals and minority shareholders of passive foreign corporations | OP 138-Bis/2024/115/8 Tax Notes International | OP 138-Bis/2024/115/8-1 Italy’s cooperative compliance regime | OP 138-Bis/2024/115/8-2 Court ruling reignites the SAAR vs GAAR debate in India | OP 138-Bis/2024/115/8-3 The usefulness of Pillar 1 | OP 138-Bis/2024/115/8-4 America the tax haven and its trade deficits | OP 138-Bis/2024/115/9 Tax Notes International |
Aditya Singh Chandel is a partner and Akshat Jain is an associate with AZB & Partners in Delhi, India. In this article, Chandel and Jain examine the history of the codification of antiavoidance rules in India, the principles laid down in a recent ruling by the Telangana High Court, and what the ruling means for Indian business arrangements.
There are no comments for this item.