Are exit taxes discriminatory? by Reuven S. Avi Yonah
By: Avi Yonah, Reuven Shlomo
.
Material type: 



Item type | Current location | Home library | Call number | Status | Date due | Barcode |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Artículos | IEF | IEF | OP 138-Bis2024/114/13-5 (Browse shelf) | Available | OP 138-Bis2024/114/13-5 |
Browsing IEF Shelves Close shelf browser
No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | ||
OP 138-Bis2024/114/13-2 What CFOs are saying about Pillar 2 | OP 138-Bis2024/114/13-3 Virtual permanent establishment | OP 138-Bis2024/114/13-4 U.N. makes progress toward a framework convention on International Tax Cooperation | OP 138-Bis2024/114/13-5 Are exit taxes discriminatory? | OP 138-Bis/2024/114/1-4 Canada Studies IP box initiative | OP 138-Bis/2024/114/1-5 Constitutional court buries case law on cross-border pensions | OP 138-Bis/2024/114/1-6 Transfer pricing benchmark |
Reuven S. Avi-Yonah (aviyonah@umich.edu) is the Irwin I. Cohn Professor of Law at the University of Michigan Law School. He thanks David Gamage, Robert Goulder, Nicola Sartori, Wolfgang Schoen, and Fadi Shaheen for helpful comments. In this installment of Reflections With Reuven Avi-Yonah, Avi-Yonah explores whether the United States or EU member states are in a better position regarding exit taxes.
There are no comments for this item.