Normal view MARC view ISBD view

Average tax rates for rich and poor German Personal Income Tax from 1998 to 2019 Martin Beznoska

By: Beznoska, Martin.
Material type: ArticleArticleSubject(s): IMPUESTO SOBRE LA RENTA DE LAS PERSONAS FISICAS | TIPOS DE GRAVAMEN | PROGRESIVIDAD | ALEMANIA In: FinanzArchiv v. 79, n. 4, December 2023, p. 275-307Summary: Measuring the effective tax progressivity of personal income tax over the whole income distribution, and consistently defined over time, is an important tool with which to evaluate tax reforms. While survey data provides the representative income distribution, it measures the tax liabilities imprecisely and lacks representativity at the top. Administrative tax data overcomes these disadvantages, but does not reflect the overall income distribution, as it excludes non-taxable incomes and those who do not pay the tax. In this paper, I provide a matching, easy-to-implement strategy that combines these two types of data to exploit their advantages. This approach can be applied to different years of repeated cross-sections, which results in a representative and time-consistent database for the distributional analysis of income and taxes. As a result, the effective tax rate of the top one percent of the income distribution is found to be 30.1 percent in 2019, similar to 30.3 percent in 1998 despite cuts in the marginal tax rate for the top earners during the time span.
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
    average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)
Item type Current location Home library Call number Status Date due Barcode
Artículos IEF
IEF
OP 207/2023/4-1 (Browse shelf) Available OP 207/2023/4-1

Resumen.

Bibliografía.

Measuring the effective tax progressivity of personal income tax over the whole income distribution, and consistently defined over time, is an important tool with which to evaluate tax reforms. While survey data provides the representative income distribution, it measures the tax liabilities imprecisely and lacks representativity at the top. Administrative tax data overcomes these disadvantages, but does not reflect the overall income distribution, as it excludes non-taxable incomes and those who do not pay the tax. In this paper, I provide a matching, easy-to-implement strategy that combines these two types of data to exploit their advantages. This approach can be applied to different years of repeated cross-sections, which results in a representative and time-consistent database for the distributional analysis of income and taxes. As a result, the effective tax rate of the top one percent of the income distribution is found to be 30.1 percent in 2019, similar to 30.3 percent in 1998 despite cuts in the marginal tax rate for the top earners during the time span.

There are no comments for this item.

Log in to your account to post a comment.

Powered by Koha