Normal view MARC view ISBD view

Most favoured nation clauses in tax treaties electrónico comparative analysis and main issues Nupur Jalan, Gaetano Manzi and Gert Greve Arcil

By: Jalan, Nupur.
Contributor(s): Manzi, Gaetano | Greve Arcil, Gert.
Material type: ArticleArticleSubject(s): FISCALIDAD INTERNACIONAL | DOBLE IMPOSICION | CONVENIOS | TRATADOS INTERNACIONALES | CLÁUSULA DE NACIÓN MÁS FAVORECIDA | DERECHO COMPARADO In: World Tax Journal v. 14, n. 1, 2022, p. 139-184Summary: Over time, the use of most favoured nation clauses has seen widespread adoption in double tax treaties, especially in those agreed with developing countries. The use of such clauses, however, does not appear to have been supported frequently by tax policies and/or careful ad hoc analysis, e.g. on the structure, wording and consequences of these provisions in the relevant tax treaty networks. The lack of a model clause in the OECD and UN Model Conventions, and the proliferation of many variants could have played a role in this regard. Because of this, the application of this clause still today triggers many issues that can prevent, for example, its clear and correct interpretation and application and the enjoyment of legitimate treaty benefits by taxpayers or may entail challenges for treaty negotiations. These issues may relate mainly to the nature of such clauses and the policies behind them, as well as to the lack of a clear wording that can facilitate their application in different ways.
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
    average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)
Item type Current location Home library Call number Status Date due Barcode
Recursos electrónicos IEF
IEF
WTJ/2022/1-2 (Browse shelf) Available WTJ/2022/1-2

Resumen.

Over time, the use of most favoured nation clauses has seen widespread adoption in double tax treaties, especially in those agreed with developing countries. The use of such clauses, however, does not appear to have been supported frequently by tax policies and/or careful ad hoc analysis, e.g. on the structure, wording and consequences of these provisions in the relevant tax treaty networks. The lack of a model clause in the OECD and UN Model Conventions, and the proliferation of many variants could have played a role in this regard. Because of this, the application of this clause still today triggers many issues that can prevent, for example, its clear and correct interpretation and application and the enjoyment of legitimate treaty benefits by taxpayers or may entail challenges for treaty negotiations. These issues may relate mainly to the nature of such clauses and the policies behind them, as well as to the lack of a clear wording that can facilitate their application in different ways.

There are no comments for this item.

Log in to your account to post a comment.

Click on an image to view it in the image viewer

Powered by Koha