Whirlpool law or policy? by Fadi Shaheen
By: Shaheen, Fadi
.
Material type: 






Item type | Current location | Home library | Call number | Status | Date due | Barcode |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Artículos | IEF | IEF | OP 138-Bis/2022/107/6-3 (Browse shelf) | Available | OP 138-Bis/2022/107/6-3 |
Browsing IEF Shelves Close shelf browser
No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | ||
OP 138-Bis/2022/107/6 Tax Notes International | OP 138-Bis/2022/107/6-1 FTC regs | OP 138-Bis/2022/107/6-2 Transfer pricing benchmark | OP 138-Bis/2022/107/6-3 Whirlpool | OP 138-Bis/2022/107/6-4 Pillar 2 and the corporate AMT | OP 138-Bis/2022/107/7 Tax Notes International | OP 138-Bis/2022/107/8 Tax Notes International |
Resumen.
Incluye referencias bibliográficas.
In this article, the author argues that while two U.S. courts reached the desirable policy result in the Whirlpool case, their conclusion that the foreign base company sales income branch rule applies not only to sales branches but also to manufacturing branches is inconsistent with the statutory text.
There are no comments for this item.