Can pillar 2 be leveraged to save pillar 1? by Heydon Wardell-Burrus
By: Wardell-Burrus, Heydon
.
Material type: 






Item type | Current location | Home library | Call number | Status | Date due | Barcode |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Artículos | IEF | IEF | OP 138-Bis/2022/107/3-4 (Browse shelf) | Available | OP 138-Bis/2022/107/3-4 |
Browsing IEF Shelves Close shelf browser
No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | ||
OP 138-Bis/2022/107/3-1 Cisco’s cost-sharing arrangement | OP 138-Bis/2022/107/3-2 A Comment on the EU’s Proposed Debt-Equity Bias Reduction Allowance Directive | OP 138-Bis/2022/107/3-3 Taxation of virtual digital assets in India | OP 138-Bis/2022/107/3-4 Can pillar 2 be leveraged to save pillar 1? | OP 138-Bis/2022/107/3-5 SPAC merger said to satisfy COBE requirement | OP 138-Bis/2022/107/4 Tax Notes International | OP 138-Bis/2022/107/4-1 Global minimum taxes |
Resumen.
Incluye referencias bibliográficas.
In this article, the author sets out a pillar 1 design proposal that leverages pillar 2 to reallocate taxing rights to market jurisdictions and avoid double taxation without requiring amendments to U.S. tax treaties.
There are no comments for this item.