Canadian Appeal Court rejects government's treaty-shopping arguments against Luxembourg holding company by Michael N. Kandev and Jesse A. Boretsky
By: Kandev, Michael
.
Contributor(s): Boretsky, Jesse A
.
Material type: 






Item type | Current location | Home library | Call number | Status | Date due | Barcode |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Artículos | IEF | IEF | OP 138-Bis/2020/98/11-2 (Browse shelf) | Available | OP 138-Bis/2020/98/11-2 |
Browsing IEF Shelves Close shelf browser
No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | ||
OP 138-Bis/2020/98/10-2 Dealing with tax populism | OP 138-Bis/2020/98/11 Tax Notes International | OP 138-Bis/2020/98/11-1 The need to close the FATCA loophole to preserve the integrity of U.S. tax enforcement efforts | OP 138-Bis/2020/98/11-2 Canadian Appeal Court rejects government's treaty-shopping arguments against Luxembourg holding company | OP 138-Bis/2020/98/11-3 Transfer pricing and COVID-19 | OP 138-Bis/2020/98/11-4 FTCs and the "two-state problem" | OP 138-Bis/2020/98/12 Tax Notes International |
Disponible también en formato electrónico.
Resumen.
In this article, the authors discuss the Canadian Federal Court of Appeal's judgment in Alta Energy, focusing on its effect on Canada's application of general antiabuse rules against contested treaty benefit claims and the OECD multilateral instrument's principal purpose test on perceived treaty shopping.
There are no comments for this item.