Sauvage Luxembourg employment income may be taxed in Belgium, says CJEU by Tom O'Shea
By: O'Shea, Tom
.
Material type: 






Item type | Current location | Home library | Call number | Status | Date due | Barcode |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Artículos | IEF | IEF | OP 138-Bis/2019/93/1-3 (Browse shelf) | Available | OP 138-Bis/2019/93/1-3 |
Browsing IEF Shelves Close shelf browser
No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | ||
OP 138-Bis/2019/93/12 Tax Notes International | OP 138-Bis/2019/93/12-1 U.S. treasury criticism of EU anti-money laundering blacklist shows cracks in financial enforcement | OP 138-Bis/2019/93/12-2 Nigerian transfer pricing safe harbor provisions revisited | OP 138-Bis/2019/93/1-3 Sauvage | OP 138-Bis/2019/93/1-4 The Italian high-net-worth individual tax regime in practice | OP 138-Bis/2019/93/2 Tax Notes International | OP 138-Bis/2019/93/2-1 Why upstream oil and gas poses lower transfer pricing risks than other industries |
Resumen.
In this article, the author analyzes the Court of Justice of the European Union's judgment in Sauvage, which addressed the tax treatment of employment income earned in Luxembourg by a Belgian resident that did not relate to days of physical presence in Luxembourg.
There are no comments for this item.